Showing posts with label German. Show all posts
Showing posts with label German. Show all posts

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Image: Camel Photobombs Kubelwagen

Above:  A Bactrian Camel stands behind a V.W. Kubelwagen and Wehrmacht men.

In this photograph we see a V.W. Kubelwagen (bucket car), the equivalent of the American Jeep for German armed forces.  While obscured by shadow, part of the divisional insignia to which this vehicle belongs can be seen just underneath the right headlight.  Both of these lights are covered to keep out the sand, and to reduce the amount of light reflecting off the vehicle.  The man on the left is an officer, and panning to the right we see his driver and another soldier (perhaps an aid for the officer?).  In the background are buildings which resemble barracks, and of course a Bactrian Camel.

At first I assumed this photograph was taken in North Africa; however, after a few minutes on Google it appears that Bactrian Camels live primarily (and almost exclusively) in the dry parts of China!  It is possible this could be North Africa, but now I have to consider the possibility of the Caucasus where the German army fought against the Soviets, as this is probably the closest to China the German army got in its drive east.  An interesting website dedicated to the rebuilding of an old Kubelwagen  can be found here.  This site claims the photograph above was taken in Africa, but does not offer any evidence or explanation about the displaced Camel.  For the time being we will just have to call the location of the photograph "The Desert". 

Monday, June 24, 2013

Image: Guitar in Normandy


Normandy 1944, near Buron:  The man on the left side of this photograph is Untersturmfuhrer Franz-Joseph Kneipp of III./SS-PanzerGrenadier Regiment 25 (12th SS Hitlerjugend Panzer Division).  He sits on the edge of a trench and plays guitar for other members of the unit during a lull in the fighting.  On the right is Battalion Adjutant Kurt Bergmann, and just out of sight to the left is Battalion Commander Obersturmbannfuhrer Karl-Heinz Milius.  Kneipp is wearing a Waffen SS Plane Tree pattern tunic (Platanenmuster), while Bergmann is wearing a Splinter Pattern tunic (Splittertarn).

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Image: Sanität


Somewhere in France, 1940:  A combat medic from the Wermacht medical service (Sanitätsdienste), applies bandages to the wounded foot of a German solder.  The large canister sitting to the wounded mans left, and still attached to his combat harness, is a gas mask container.  The worn metal container hanging on the center of his back is his mess tin.  In the background can be seen an officer conducting a conference with a handful of men, while two more soldiers have their faces in the dirt.  I presume these two men are either seeking cover or handling something delicate.  The black line running to the right of this photograph is more than likely for telecommunication, allowing the officer here to coordinate with the greater battle being fought around him.

Sunday, April 7, 2013

Panzers!




    Recently I found an archive of episodes for the series "German War Files".  This is an excellent series I recommend to all students of the German military of the 1930s and 1940s.  While the narration is often drowned out a bit by the unbalanced newsreel audio, the footage and information provided are wonderful, as well as the accompanying musical score.  I have linked the episode "Panzer: Germany's Ultimate War Machine" to my blog for your convenience.

    In addition to propaganda and newsreel footage, a number of training films are also included on this particular episode. "Kampfpanzer beim Einsatz" begins at time index 10:30 and familiarizes the viewer with some of the procedures and tactics used by the Panzer V crews (Panther), and those used by Soviet infantry.  "Lerhfilm Number 480" (training film number 480) begins at time index 20:07.  This excellent film illustrates the preparation, execution, restitution of lines, and withdrawal of a German mechanized infantry counterattack.  I highly recommend Lerhfilm 480 to anyone desiring a more detailed look at German small unit combined arms tactics.  

Total running time for this episode is 51:53.

Sunday, February 24, 2013

Welcome to Mr Boot's Axis Blog!


 Hello and welcome to my blog!  "Mr Boot's Axis Blog" features articles on culture, militaria, politics, and other interesting tidbits from the 1930s and 1940s, with a focus on the Axis point of view, and more often than not, the German point of view specifically.  I appreciate positive feedback, but discourage political messages.  This blog is to entertain and educate, not to promote or slander anyone's ideologies.  I hope you find something here that you like, and thank you for dropping by!

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

The Assault Badge


 Above:  An Assault Badge in Silver from my personal collection.  The image is of a K-98 Rifle with fixed bayonet, surrounded by a wreath of oak leaves, and overlooked by an eagle clutching a swastika.

The German Assault Badge was instituted on December 20th 1939, by Commander of the Army (Oberbefehlshaber des Heeres) Heinrich Alfred Walther von Brauchitsh. It was designed by the C.E. Junker firm in Berlin, but was produced by a wide variety of manufacturers.  The vast majority of these medals were never numbered and this is true for the example above, the back is totally smooth excepting the pin.  This medal is 6.3 centimeters high, 4.9 centimeters wide, slightly convex, finished with silver, intricately detailed, and typically worn on the breast pocket.

The assault badge was awarded to enlisted men, NCOs and officers of non-motorized infantry units, including mountain troops.  To qualify one had to achieve one or more of the following.


- To have taken part in three or more infantry assaults.
- To have taken part in three or more infantry counterattacks.
- To have taken part in three or more armed reconnaissance operations.
- To have engaged in hand to hand combat while in an assault operation.
- To have participated on three separate days in the restitution of combat positions.


For multiple attacks in one day only one credit was earned, all the attacks had to take place on separate days.  The regimental commander was responsible for issuing an Assault Badge and it was customary to receive the award in the field, with the men of one’s own unit.  The first two assault badges given out were done so on a special occasion on May 28th 1940, by the field marshal Brauchitsh himself.


Above:  An Assault Badge in Bronze.  Photo from the web.

On June 1st 1940, a decision was made to allow members of the Waffen SS to qualify for the medal, and at the same time a new Assault Badge was commissioned for members of the motorized infantry and Panzer crews.  The requirements being the same, but acknowledging the motorized nature of their fighting style.  This was the Assault Badge in Bronze, which by design is identical to the original version (except being finished in bronze).  It was decided in November of 1942, to allow Order Police units (Ordnungspolizei) to qualify for the badge in silver.


Above:  A variety of Nahkampfspange, bronze, silver and gold.  Photo from the web.

During that same year in October; however, the Assault Badge in both its silver and bronze form were made obsolete with the introduction of the Close Combat Clasp (Nahkampfspange).  This clasp used a different method entirely for qualification, and came in a wider range of variations indicative to the degree of the deed performed.


While National Socialist symbolism was outlawed in Germany after its defeat and subsequent occupation, it was recognized that German servicement had contributed a great deal to their country, and sacrificed much.  As a result of this and other pressures the Ordens-Gesetz, or Medal Law, was instituted in 1957.  This allowed modified versions of medals such as the assault badge to be produced and worn again, providing recognition to the men who earned it.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Fjell Festning: A Brief Overview 1

Above:  A trench connecting to regelbau and field positions.  Picture taken five years ago, but a great shot revealing the hidden nature of the facility.

Fjell Fortress (or Fjell Festning if you are Norwegian) exists on the fringes of the busy town Bergen in southwestern Norway.  This fort is actually a massive gun turret, and series of tunnels and rooms built beneath a mountain.  With a great number of surrounding bunkers and smaller gun positions to protect the perimeter, main gun, and tunnel entrances.  This was the largest fortress built in Norway by the Germans, and the third largest fortress built by the Third Reich in general.  Fjell Festning was still in use by NATO until 2003.

 Above:  A map showing the location of Fjell Fortress in relation to Bergen and associated communities Straume, and Fjell.

The day we arrived it was a bit cold,  foggy, and consistently showering us with a light drizzle of rain. The terrain is hilly and often steep.  The surrounding countryside is very lush, with many ferns and pine trees.  Some of the bunkers are currently overgrown with ferns and fauna of various sorts, and locked steel doors prevent access into many of the bunkers and smaller tunnels.  All, or nearly all of these positions are masterfully camouflaged.  Often it is only from one direction that these regelbau bunkers can be looked at and recognized for what they are.  When standing on top of these bunkers, an attached ringstand or ventilation pipe is often the only clue as the to nature of the inconspicuous "mound".  Additionally, since many of these bunkers are built into the side of a hill, there is no "mound" worth mentioning, only an extension of the natural slope of the hill itself.  From the air the 283 mm triple gun turret could easily be seen, but the rest of the compound must have been almost invisible.


The entire fortress as a whole actually covers much more ground than what the display above shows.  An abundance of other bunkers, Flak positions, artillery positions, road blocks, military buildings, and trenches exist in the surrounding areas, all built to compliment the subterranean complex and naval gun at the top of the mountain.  Standing in the area that the above map displays, gives one little to no clue, that there are in fact many long tunnels and big rooms deep beneath your feet. This primitive map simply illustrates the positions in the immediate vicinity of the triple 283 mm turret, which was certainly the centerpiece of the fort.

Above:  Ringstand on top of the same 629.

Above:  Type 629 regelbau with trench.      

The bunker in the two pictures above is the southern most of those located next to the main gun turret, and acted as part of a perimeter defense network.  Its location can be identified by the blue circle indicated in the map above.  This Regelbau bunker was a type 629 sonderausfuhrung (special version).  Type 629s were PAK (anti-tank) shelters.  This one probably held a smaller caliber weapon such as the 3.7 cm PAK 36.  This gun would be kept in the shelter when not in use, or when under artillery attack.  It would then be wheeled out of the bunker into a firing position when the time came to fight.  Notice the dark subterranean entrance.  This is actually an entrance/exit to a system of communication trenches.  A short flight of steps can be seen on the right, disappearing into the bunker wall.  This leads to a ringstand which sits camouflaged atop the bunker, and offers a 360 degree field of fire.  It does not connect to the rest of the bunker internally.   

Above:  3.7 cm Panzer Abwehr Kanone (anti-tank cannon).  The 629 gun shelter in question probably contained one of these.

 Above:  The garage for a smaller caliber PAK in the same regelbau 629.

Just out of sight, and immediately to the right in the picture displaying the trench and ringstand entrance, is the gun garage.  Notice the hollow floor center.  This space would be used to store munitions for the gun assigned to this shelter, and would be covered by easily removable wooden planks most of the time.  I could not find a proper door here, or the remains of one for that matter.  As the site was never completely finished, it is possible that an armored door was never installed.  Note the brickwork in the right of the picture.  This leads me to believe that after the war the Norwegians may have bricked the garage up to keep people out of the bunker.  A number of other similar bunkers had this brickwork present as well.

Above:  The trench entrance/exit is more of a tunnel...

 Above:  ..and then opens up to sky and light.
 
The entrance to the trench system here runs underground for a short distance before reaching the surface and open sky.  This then twists and turns for a long distance, connecting with many other bunkers and field fortifications.  From the top these are very hard to see.  The trench system will be covered more in later posts.

Above:  The same 629 shelter, looking back from the trench entrance.  Notice the garage on the left.

More to come soon!  Fjell Festning:  A Brief Overview 2


Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Media Clip #2: Sculpture at Haus Der Kunst


The Haus der Kunst (House of Art) was constructed in Munich, taking four years until completion in 1937.  It opened on July 18th of that same year.  It was the first grand structure built in the National Socialist design, and held the Third Reich's finest art.  It is still in use.  I linked this unusual clip featuring sculptures which were once on display at Haus der Kunst.  The film subtitles first display the name of the artist, and then the name of the sculpture.  I recommend opening the video window to full screen.  Busts of some very notable characters can be seen, including Friedrich Nietzsche and Erwin Rommel!

Above:  Haus der Kunst in Munich
 

Friday, August 24, 2012

Just for fun, and a taste of things to come.

Fjell Fortress is amazing, and I look forward to sharing more about it.  I am still out of country for the moment; however, here are a few photos for fun, and for a taste of future blogs to come.



Above:  A smaller Regelbau bunker for perimeter defense with connecting communications trench.  While just out of sight in the camera shot, a Ringstande lies on top of this bunker.  This is basically a neck-high hole in the bunker roof, specially designed to allow a man with a machine gun to cover the position.  One can turn and fire a full 360 degrees in such a hole.




Above:  A variety of rocket projectiles.  To the far right are two more modern "Cold War" era American designed L.A.W. launchers.  The two longer devices in the middle and far left are German Panzerfaust (tank fist) rocket propelled grenades.  These were disposable, one time use weapons.  They used a shaped charge capable of defeating the armor of any Allied or Comintern vehicle of the time.




Above:  For many, this machine needs no introduction.  Maschinengewehr model 1942.  Or more colloquially MG-42.  Also known as the "Circle Saw", "Buzz Saw", or "Hitler Saw".  With an average rate of fire at 1200 rounds per minute, it could very literally cut a man in two.  This one is attached to a heavy mount for the sustained fire role.




Above:  Just one of many tunnels under the mountain at Fortress Fjell. 

Monday, August 13, 2012

Norway!



On April 8th of 1940, in an attempt to stop shipments of iron ore to Germany through Norway.  The British and French began operation "Wilfred", which involved mining Norwegian waters.  It was expected that the Germans would react to this, which would give the British and French a pretext to launch operation "Plan R4", the invasion of Norway.  They would then occupy the country as part of an economic barricade around the Reich.  The Germans, already aware of British plans to mine, and then invade Norway, stepped up work on an existing plan "Weserubung".  This too was an invasion of Norway, but with the intention of keeping trade, and specifically iron ore flowing into the Reich.

The Two sides clashed almost simultaneously, and the Norwegians found themselves being invaded from two different directions by two powerful modern military machines.  Each attacking under the ironic explanation that they were only trying to help the Norwegians from being occupied by the enemy.  Ultimately the Germans won a resounding victory, albeit at a high cost to the Kriegsmarine, losing 1 heavy cruiser, 2 light cruisers, 6 U-boats, and half of its 20 destroyers with several other ships taking significant damage ("The campaign in Norway", T.K. Derry) .  This short campaign officially ended on June 10th 1940, with the Norwegian surrender to Germany.  For the duration of the war, the Germans would transform Norway into a fortress, featuring some of the most impressive defensive positions along the entire Atlantic wall.

Tonight, I leave for Iceland and Norway with my significant other Pink.  Among other activities we will be visiting the super heavy naval battery "Fjell" near Bergen in Norway.  This massive complex of bunkers, casemates, gun positions, and tunnels was built by the Germans during the occupation.  The centerpiece of this complex was the turret "Felix", removed from the battle cruiser "Gneisenau", featuring three 280-mm guns!  The turret no longer remains, but the rest of the site is in good condition.  Southeast of Bergen I am going to try to get over to battery "Lista" near the town of Farsund as well.  There are quite a few bunkers here, including many tank turrets set into concrete foundations. 

When I return I will compile a series of posts discussing the different bunkers and various positions in these areas.  These will feature up to date color photos!  There will likely be a dearth of posts while I am away, but I may display some pictures if I have a chance.

Wish me luck!

Thursday, August 9, 2012

Media clip #1 "Bonzai Hitlerjugend"

 

With the formalization of the Anti-Comintern pact on November 25th 1936, which united a number of nations against Communism (particularly against Soviet Russia), Japanese and German relations became much more intimate and active.  This resulted in much cultural exchange, including private and government sponsored educational trips by students of both nations.  The Hitlerjugend (Hitler Youth) send many young Germans to Japan to learn about Japanese culture, and to continue fostering positive relations among the two peoples.

I have uploaded an eclectic piece titled "Bonzai Hitlerjugend".  The song was composed by Tkakai Tetsuo.  The lyrics were written by one of the most celebrated, popular, and important figures in modern Japanese literature, Kitahara Ryukichi (who famously went by the pen name Hakushu Kitaraha).  "Bonzai Hitlerjugend" was performed for the reception of a large Hitlerjugend visit to Japan in 1938. 

Enjoy!

Friday, August 3, 2012

Anti-tank Dogs

Above: An armored command car drives past a liberated Russian anti-tank dog.

Recently I had someone ask me about Russian Anti-tank dogs.  They were indeed real.  Here is a little information about  the subject.

Anti-tank dogs have been used by a number of nations and groups throughout the world.  A recent example taking place in Iraq 2005.  The Russian use of the animals between 1940 and 1945 has probably received most attention, although they have been in use by the Russian military as late as the mid 90s .  These dogs were regularly starved, and then trained to look for food underneath tanks.  The idea being that the contact detonator sticking out of the dogs back, would strike the bottom of the tank blowing up both the machine and animal.

When training took place, the Russians used their own tanks.  These tanks used diesel fuel unlike their German counterparts.  Furthermore there were little or no live firing exercises with the dogs during this training.  When the time came to put the animals to use, they often returned to the handlers, frightened from the noise of the battlefield and tank fire.  This resulted in many dead Russians from friendly anti-tank charges going off in their own trench, and of course many dead dogs.  When released into the German lines during "quiet" moments of the front.  It was found that these dogs usually sought out the familiar smell of diesel, and destroyed Russian tanks behind their own lines instead while searching for something to eat.


German units operating in areas where anti-tank dogs had been discovered were warned about this threat, and the order was given to shoot unknown dogs in no mans land, and to beware of animals that did not obviously belong to a German unit.  If possible, German soldiers often tried to coax the animal with food before disabling the explosive device, and then releasing the animal.  Other times, in accordance with their orders the poor animals simply had to be shot.

The overall effectiveness of these anti-tank dogs is uncertain at best.  Losses recorded by the Germans to these animals show very small numbers, while official Soviet history claims some 300 German tanks destroyed.  Gottlob Biddermann's  personal account "In Deadly Combat", makes mention of these anti-tank dogs being used by Russian troops not very far from Leningrad.  Recollections and statements made by German soldiers active in those areas of the front, indicate that the dogs made for quite a commotion among the troops, but had very little impact on their ability to fight or survive.  Biddermann's account confirms this as well.  Additionally the official Soviet claim of 300 has been since seriously questioned by Russian historians, who view such a claim as propaganda.  Much training went into these faithful canines, but for a role meant to consume the very life of the animal itself.  This arguably nulls the value of the time and resources spent in the animals education.  It also makes it quite easy for others to slander a nation that uses such tactics.

Russian anti-tank dogs were not fiction, but a product of desperation.  They make for a very imaginative way of waging war, but cost those who use them for such ends, the very trust and life of "mans best friend". 


Thursday, August 2, 2012

Crossing A Defended Bridge

*This is a paper I wrote a while back for a journalism class.  Because of the subject matter, I felt this may be interesting to others.  While certainly not all inclusive, this article should give a reader some idea of how one might cross a bridge in wartime using equipment and tactics from the mid to late 1940s.

 
            I have spent years studying various military tactics and procedures, and one of the more interesting of these for me, is the crossing of a defended bridge.  It requires a high degree of precision from all parties involved, and must be done frequently under most terrain conditions when on the attack.  While a set of "text book" instructions rarely hold up under combat conditions, these should nevertheless provide a pretty accurate description of how such things are done.  We will then build our scenario as follows.

            Let us assume we are the commander of an armored task force, spearheading the main assault of one or more regiments or even divisions.  For flavor, let us assume we are commanding a German unit of said description.  That makes our task force (Kampfgruppe) a mobile one, composed of a few tanks (Panzers, probably Mark 4), some armored personnel carriers (SPW, Sd.Kfz 251 and associated variants).  Also accompanying our Kampfgruppe will be the usual combat engineers (Pioneers), mechanized infantry (Panzer Grenadier) platoon or battalion, and support vehicles such an anti-aircraft (Flak), or signals vehicles.  It would be prudent to assume we may have a heavy armored car or two as well (Puma).

            After a long advance across an endless Russian countryside of fields, dust, and open sky.  The leading elements of the advance guard, report back to the Kampfgruppe that a river has been sighted ahead.  What now?  The main body of the task force will be held back, and another small party of men, in armored vehicles of some sort preferably, will advance to the riverbank slowly.  Taking precautions not to engage in a firefight with any enemy present.  The river must be examined to determine the depth and width.  That will indicate whether a bridge is necessary for the crossing. 

            Let us say that the men report back, and that the water is too deep for a crossing.  If said scouts have not already, have them reconnoiter and search for a crossing point up and down the river.  Lets say, that they have done this, and that a small bridge is to be found off a side road through some trees.  Let us also say, that the enemy has defended this bridge with troops (perhaps a Rifle Battalion), who are equipped with heavy weapons, dug in, and have a commanding field of view from the opposite bank.

            First things first.  Upon the return of your scouts, have more men search up and down river even further.  If another point exists that can be crossed without a bridge, but farther away, it would still be the preferable point to cross.  We will handle the situation in two different ways and both will be illustrated here.  Let us assume for now that the scouts did find a place well enough suited for tracked vehicles to cross.  

            Divide your men and machines into two groups.  Group A should consist of the majority of your infantry, and at least half of your tanks.  Group B should be organized around the majority of your heavy weapons (especially mortars if available), any Flak (to be used in a ground fire role), and a number of your tanks.  Group A will drive off in the direction of the shallow crossing, quietly and under cover, while group B drives toward the main bridge, making much noise and commotion.

            Precise orders must be given.  Either through wireless radio broadcast, or through a designated signal, it must be clear that group A does not attempt to cross until group B has started its mission.  Thus, have group B drive right up to the outer limits of the enemy bridgehead, and begin to immediately open fire.  This must be done carefully, and with much scrutinizing of the enemy positions.  The last thing you want is for the accompanying tanks to be taken under fire by anti-tank batteries, or for the accompanying troops to be taken under an artillery barrage. 
           
            Have the heavy weapons of group B open fire on the enemy on the opposite bank.  If clear of anti-tank guns, the Panzers should join in the shooting.  As high a rate of fire as possible, must be brought to bear on the enemy, so that they are pinned, and unable to notice or take action against the workings of group A.  Mortars will come in very handy here, as their ballistic arc of fire will negate many types of field works used by enemy troops, making their position very precarious.  The enemy should believe that you are now attempting a crossing at the bridge, especially with the withering fire brought to bear on him.  He may even call for reinforcements to his position.


            Now group A  makes the shallow crossing at maximum speed, avoiding confrontation with the enemy if possible.  Once they have gotten to the other side, they proceed to the site of the bridge, but from the enemy side of the bank!  Group A positions itself in the flank or rear of the enemy lines, and opens an attack, enveloping the Russian forces stationed there.  Under attack from 2 or more directions, and with Panzers and Grenadiers right on his doorstep, the enemy must be forced out of his positions or be annihilated.  Even if he had called up reinforcements, these will be taken under surprise attack by group A as well, and likely smashed by concentrated tank and small arms fire.  In fact, having those reinforcements brought up could be a huge boon for the Kampfgruppe, as they will no longer be in a position of their choosing to initiate a fight, but one of our choosing! 

            Essentially, this is a victory.  The enemy lines can now be rolled up from the enemy side of the river, and group B can now cross at their leisure.  Take care still, to inspect the bridge for demolitions or sabotage by Pioneers before sending anyone across, as sappers may have stayed behind for just such a purpose.  After "mop up" duties are complete, groups A and B rejoin, and our Kampfgruppe continues its advance.  Mission accomplished!  On the other hand, what if there was no alternate crossing?  How would one get across the defended bridge?  Lets travel back in time a little.

            Upon the return of your scouts, it is determined that the only crossing that can be made, is the enemy bridge.  Have all of the men dismount from their vehicles, and have them spread out into their respective combat formations (the work of the platoon leaders).  Deploy all available heavy weapons and Flak, under any cover available.  Split the tanks up into small groups, and have them wait behind cover, ready to drive to the river bank.  When ready, order all heavy weapons and Flak to open fire.  The concentration of fire on the enemy must be extremely thick, and should come as a total surprise.  It must be ruthless and shocking, so as to paralyze the enemy in his positions.

            At this moment, have Pioneers approach the bridge (no doubt under fire).  They must determine if the bridge is safe to cross, and remove any traps or charges that may have been set.  As they do this order the Grenadiers to move up, and open fire on the enemy as well, providing the maximum possible cover for the Pioneers and their work.  Once the bridge has been determined, or made clear for travel, it is time for the Panzers to go to work.

            Sending only one or two across at a time, but at the greatest possible speed, have some of your tanks get to the enemy side of the river.  Once the first tank has crossed, order the heavy weapons and Flak to adjust their targets slightly away, and to the side of the advancing Panzers.  Once the first one or two panzers is across, have the grenadiers begin to cross as well, as the tanks on the opposite side will need their assistance in clearing out the enemy from his holes and hides. 

            Once these units have made it across the enemy bridge, it is time to make an evaluation.  If enemy reinforcements are likely underway, you will need the majority of your troops on the other side of the bridge to fight them successfully.  If you cross with the rest of your men and machines, and the enemy fire has not subsided much, you are likely to lose the rest of your force on the very bridge you are trying to claim.  Therefore, if enemy fire has died down enough for you to feel comfortable sending the rest of the men across, then you must do it immediately before the situation changes.  If not, then more time must be taken for the men who have crossed, and the weapons providing cover on your side of the bank, to do their jobs of suppressing the enemy gunners.  This; however, is dangerous and risks you loosing the men who have made that first daring crossing.  You need to get as many men on the other bank as quickly as possible. 


            Assuming things went alright from here, mop up duty is performed on the enemy bank, and the groups rejoin to form our Kampfgruppe.  Which then proceeds on its way to greater glory.  Of course it is quite possible that you will need to secure the bridge and surrounding areas until your parent unit has arrived to take over.  The key here is speed.  The faster you pull off the above, the faster your men move, the faster they shoot at a surprised enemy.  The greater their odds of survival become, and the greater the chances of your mission succeeding as well.  A smaller group who possesses the initiative, and uses a speed and shock to achieve their goals, usually succeeds even over a larger sized, dug in foe.

            With both scenarios illustrated here, and especially the second one, one statement holds true.  If you were fast enough, and hitting hard enough, you probably succeeded.  This then, is a "truism" I would like to leave you with to mull over.  When attacking in general, energy and rapid action win the day.  Keeping the enemy off balance and uncertain as to your next move, will help you get through enemy villages, around dangerous roadblocks, over fortified hills, and across that intimidating bridge in front of your task force.  I hope you had some fun reading my little "how-to" piece, I hope you learned something new about a few 1940s era military tactics. 

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Welcome to Mr Boot's Axis Blog



 Hello and welcome to my blog!  "Mr Boot's Axis Blog" features articles on culture, militaria, politics, and other interesting tidbits from the 1930s and 1940s, with a focus on the Axis point of view, and more often than not, the German point of view specifically.  I appreciate positive feedback, but discourage political messages.  This blog is to entertain and educate, not to promote or slander anyone's ideologies.  I hope you find something here that you like, and thank you for dropping by!